We currently say that the error port of a catch will return a c:errors document containing one or more c:error elements. I think this is a mistake. I think we should say simply that a sequence of one or more c:error documents appears on the error port. Given that different steps can generate error messages, it's a real burden to make sure that they're all wrapped in a single c:errors element. And the extra work doesn't seem to have any benefits. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | We humans are such limited http://nwalsh.com/ | creatures--how is it that there are so | few limits when it comes to human | suffering?--Pierre MarivauxReceived on Sunday, 18 May 2008 20:00:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 18 May 2008 20:00:00 GMT