W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Remove c:errors

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 15:53:59 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0805190653s521dcc1foe0afc6c007c2d395@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

Can we have best of both world as we already do with c:param :

Letīs say we have a sequence of c:errors

Mohamed

On 5/18/08, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> We currently say that the error port of a catch will return a c:errors
> document containing one or more c:error elements. I think this is a
> mistake. I think we should say simply that a sequence of one or more
> c:error documents appears on the error port.
>
> Given that different steps can generate error messages, it's a real
> burden to make sure that they're all wrapped in a single c:errors
> element. And the extra work doesn't seem to have any benefits.
>
>                                        Be seeing you,
>                                          norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | We humans are such limited
> http://nwalsh.com/            | creatures--how is it that there are so
>                              | few limits when it comes to human
>                              | suffering?--Pierre Marivaux
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 19 May 2008 13:55:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 19 May 2008 13:55:45 GMT