W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Add p:canonicalize as an optional step or add an option in p:serialize

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 14:01:31 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0805010501j18983158gd7c5c5e194e6e94b@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Yeah I was thinking of something like a p:store

May be that just need to be an option of p:serialize ?



On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:

> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | I would go for a p:canonicalize as an optional step
>
> What's it's signature? One input and no outputs, with an href for
> where to write the C14N'd octets?
>
>
>                                        Be seeing you,
>                                          norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Klein bottle for rent; enquire within.
> http://nwalsh.com/            |
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:02:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 May 2008 12:02:07 GMT