Re: Add p:canonicalize as an optional step or add an option in p:serialize

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 07:57:10 -0400 To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org Message-ID: <m2bq3qme3t.fsf@nwalsh.com> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 May 2008 11:57:48 GMT

/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| I would go for a p:canonicalize as an optional step

What's it's signature? One input and no outputs, with an href for
where to write the C14N'd octets?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Klein bottle for rent; enquire within.
http://nwalsh.com/            | 