W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Scope of step types

From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:27:56 +0100 (BST)
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20070928122756.9781B269061@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk>

> No, I don't think that was intended. How about
>   The scope of the names of step types is the pipeline in which they occur.
>   The in-scope names come from types that are:
>     * Built-in to XProc (e.g., p:pipeline, p:choose, etc.)
>     * Declared with p:declare-step (e.g, p:xslt, p:xinclude, etc.)
>       in the pipeline or in a p:pipeline-library imported into the
>       pipeline.
>     * Defined with p:pipeline imported directly or in a p:pipeline-library
>       imported into the pipeline.
>     * Or built-in as extensions by a particular processor.

So a pipeline library can contain two pipelines that both declare steps
called "foo"?

-- Richard
Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 12:28:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT