Re: Scope of step types

/ Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say:
|> No, I don't think that was intended. How about
|> 
|>   The scope of the names of step types is the pipeline in which they occur.
|>   The in-scope names come from types that are:
|> 
|>     * Built-in to XProc (e.g., p:pipeline, p:choose, etc.)
|>     * Declared with p:declare-step (e.g, p:xslt, p:xinclude, etc.)
|>       in the pipeline or in a p:pipeline-library imported into the
|>       pipeline.
|>     * Defined with p:pipeline imported directly or in a p:pipeline-library
|>       imported into the pipeline.
|>     * Or built-in as extensions by a particular processor.
|
| So a pipeline library can contain two pipelines that both declare steps
| called "foo"?

As I've proposed above, yes.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | I often marvel that while each man
http://nwalsh.com/            | loves himself more than anyone else, he
                              | sets less value on his own estimate
                              | than on the opinions of others.--Marcus
                              | Aurelius