W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: XProc Minutes 27 Sep 2007

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:53:51 +0100
Message-ID: <46FC0A4F.2070007@jenitennison.com>
To: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
CC: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

Innovimax SARL wrote:
> On 9/27/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
>> I think there are three options:
>> 1. We say that implementations must not pass PSVIs between steps (which
>> means that to support Schema-Aware XSLT 2.0, the xslt2 step itself will
>> have to do schema validation; we've ruled out this option in the wording
>> Alex quoted above).
>> 2. We say that implementations *must* pass PSVIs (or XDMs, but in any
>> case augmented Infosets) between steps (which is a fairly significant
>> implementation burden, and I believe we ruled out early on in the process).
>> 3. We say that it's implementation-defined whether Infosets or PSVIs get
>> passed between steps, and provide a Note that describes the effect (as
>> discussed above).
> If I understand your concern, I think this is the current status quo
> See in A.1
> # Whether or not the pipeline processor supports passing PSVI
> annotations between steps is implementation-defined. See Section
> 7.2.3, "XML Schema Validate".

OK, good. Then hopefully this text'll make into the new section that 
Norm drafts.

Jeni Tennison
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 19:54:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:44 UTC