W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: XProc Minutes 27 Sep 2007

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:23:08 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0709271223p60fac3cck2cd6b9c293f16815@mail.gmail.com>
To: jeni@jenitennison.com
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

On 9/27/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
>
> I think there are three options:
>
> 1. We say that implementations must not pass PSVIs between steps (which
> means that to support Schema-Aware XSLT 2.0, the xslt2 step itself will
> have to do schema validation; we've ruled out this option in the wording
> Alex quoted above).
>
> 2. We say that implementations *must* pass PSVIs (or XDMs, but in any
> case augmented Infosets) between steps (which is a fairly significant
> implementation burden, and I believe we ruled out early on in the process).
>
> 3. We say that it's implementation-defined whether Infosets or PSVIs get
> passed between steps, and provide a Note that describes the effect (as
> discussed above).

If I understand your concern, I think this is the current status quo
See in A.1

# Whether or not the pipeline processor supports passing PSVI
annotations between steps is implementation-defined. See Section
7.2.3, "XML Schema Validate".

Mohamed

-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 19:23:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT