W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:37:05 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2y7d8x3i6.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Not sure to fully understand
| You speak about primary output and then you say used in some branch...
| Can you draft an exaple ?

<p:load name="load" href="...">

  <p:when test="false()">
      <p:input port="source">
        <p:pipe step="load" port="result"/>

      <p:input port="source">

So in this case, the primary output port of the load step is connected in
one branche, but not another. And in this case will never be read.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Optimistic, even in the face of reality.
http://nwalsh.com/            | 

Received on Thursday, 8 November 2007 13:37:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:44 UTC