W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:42:07 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2tznwx39s.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Thanks Richard ! got it !
| And you are proposing that in that particular case, we relax the need
| to connect foo!result.
| Well wasn't it the first purpose of p:sink ?

No, p:sink was for the case where you didn't have any other step to
connect to.

We demand that all of the p:when branches of a p:choose produce the
same outputs, but I think it would be too restrictive to demand that
they also consume the same inputs.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | [They] say the Earth is flat, but I
http://nwalsh.com/            | know that it is round, for I have seen
                              | the shadow on the moon, and I have more
                              | faith in a shadow than in
                              | [them].--Ferdinand Magellan

Received on Thursday, 8 November 2007 13:42:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:44 UTC