Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches?

Not sure to fully understand

You speak about primary output and then you say used in some branch...

Can you draft an exaple ?

Mohamed


On Nov 7, 2007 4:49 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> / Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say:
>
> | A primary output port must be connected (2.2), but is it an error if
> | it is connected only in one branch of a choose, so that it might not
> | get read?
> |
> | I would say no, since the purpose of the rule is to detect mistakes,
> | and it's quite reasonable for something to be only used in some
> | branches.
>
> I agree.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Nothing ever gets anywhere. The earth
> http://nwalsh.com/            | keeps turning round and gets nowhere.
>                               | The moment is the only thing that
>                               | counts.--Jean Cocteau
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 23:21:59 UTC