W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches?

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 00:21:37 +0100
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0711071521l6ecc2e34x5739f10845732ab7@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

Not sure to fully understand

You speak about primary output and then you say used in some branch...

Can you draft an exaple ?

Mohamed


On Nov 7, 2007 4:49 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> / Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say:
>
> | A primary output port must be connected (2.2), but is it an error if
> | it is connected only in one branch of a choose, so that it might not
> | get read?
> |
> | I would say no, since the purpose of the rule is to detect mistakes,
> | and it's quite reasonable for something to be only used in some
> | branches.
>
> I agree.
>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Nothing ever gets anywhere. The earth
> http://nwalsh.com/            | keeps turning round and gets nowhere.
>                               | The moment is the only thing that
>                               | counts.--Jean Cocteau
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 23:21:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT