W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:49:57 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2k5ou3viy.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say:
| A primary output port must be connected (2.2), but is it an error if
| it is connected only in one branch of a choose, so that it might not
| get read?
|
| I would say no, since the purpose of the rule is to detect mistakes,
| and it's quite reasonable for something to be only used in some
| branches.

I agree.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Nothing ever gets anywhere. The earth
http://nwalsh.com/            | keeps turning round and gets nowhere.
                              | The moment is the only thing that
                              | counts.--Jean Cocteau

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 15:50:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:54 GMT