W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Import precedence

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:26:01 -0700
Message-ID: <28d56ece0703201226u66adcbfcof3c5586c9d2acacb@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 3/20/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
>
>
> But is this?
>
> <p:pipeline-library>
>
>   <p:import href="somelib.xml"/>
>
>   <p:declare-step type="x:foo">
>     <p:input port="source/">
>     <p:input port="otherstuff/">
>     <p:output port="result"/>
>   </p:declare-step>
>
> </p:pipeline-library>
>
> Where somelib.xml contains:
>
> <p:pipeline-library>
>
>   <p:declare-step type="x:foo">
>     <p:input port="source/">
>     <p:output port="result"/>
>   </p:declare-step>
>
> </p:pipeline-library>



I'm not sure that makes sense. While the implementation might change,
the step's signature should remain the same.




-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2007 19:26:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT