W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: A valid pipeline?

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:28:13 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87aby9ks02.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Two points
| 1) no need of XML Schema declaration everywhere :-P

Oh, I start all my XSLT 2.0 stylesheets from a skeleton. I so
frequently want xs:something that it's just convenient to always stick
it on there.

| 2) this a case of "off the record" stuff. It is that, we said long
| time ago, that we accept side effects, and that we don't know of what
| is happening *inside* each component. This is clearly not
| interroperable in the way that XProc cannot by any means assert this
| example could do the write stuff.

I don't expect the XSLT2 component to write any "off the record" stuff.
It produces a sequence of documents. Those documents have appropriate
base URIs.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 18:28:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:42 UTC