- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:30:29 +0100
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 3/19/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | Two points > | > | 1) no need of XML Schema declaration everywhere :-P > > Oh, I start all my XSLT 2.0 stylesheets from a skeleton. I so > frequently want xs:something that it's just convenient to always stick > it on there. > > | 2) this a case of "off the record" stuff. It is that, we said long > | time ago, that we accept side effects, and that we don't know of what > | is happening *inside* each component. This is clearly not > | interroperable in the way that XProc cannot by any means assert this > | example could do the write stuff. > > I don't expect the XSLT2 component to write any "off the record" stuff. > It produces a sequence of documents. Those documents have appropriate > base URIs. Technical newby question : Do you mean we can easily from an existing XSLT component redirect all of its output ? Even with EXSLT, XSLT 1.1 and in XSLT 2.0 by any means ? > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh > XML Standards Architect > Sun Microsystems, Inc. > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 18:30:35 UTC