W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: A valid pipeline?

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:30:29 +0100
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0703191130w7cbeb569gb24dfcac43c41253@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On 3/19/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | Two points
> |
> | 1) no need of XML Schema declaration everywhere :-P
>
> Oh, I start all my XSLT 2.0 stylesheets from a skeleton. I so
> frequently want xs:something that it's just convenient to always stick
> it on there.
>
> | 2) this a case of "off the record" stuff. It is that, we said long
> | time ago, that we accept side effects, and that we don't know of what
> | is happening *inside* each component. This is clearly not
> | interroperable in the way that XProc cannot by any means assert this
> | example could do the write stuff.
>
> I don't expect the XSLT2 component to write any "off the record" stuff.
> It produces a sequence of documents. Those documents have appropriate
> base URIs.

Technical newby question :
Do you mean we can easily from an existing XSLT component redirect all
of its output ?
Even with EXSLT, XSLT 1.1 and in XSLT 2.0 by any means ?

>
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh
> XML Standards Architect
> Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 18:30:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT