- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:45:07 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 14:46:46 UTC
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| Alex Milowski writes:
|
|> * In ยง5, many of the content models have a preferred order for p:input,
|> p:output,
|> p:parameter, etc. Why wouldn't we just have a model that allows them in
|> any order:
|>
|> (p:input|p:output|p:parameter|...)*
|
| I like it the way it is. If order isn't significant, pick an order
| and require it.
Me too.
|> * Why don't we use xs:boolean for boolean flags instead of "yes" and "no"
|> (e.g. the sequence attribute on p:input)?
|
| Hear hear!
No. We don't use any XSD types anywhere else, why here? I don't plan
to have an XSD-aware XProc pipeline processor.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 14:46:46 UTC