W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Review of Spec

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:45:07 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87abyein0s.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| Alex Milowski writes:
|
|> * In ยง5, many of the content models have a preferred order for p:input,
|> p:output,
|>  p:parameter, etc.  Why wouldn't we just have a model that allows them in
|>  any order:
|>
|>  (p:input|p:output|p:parameter|...)*
|
| I like it the way it is.  If order isn't significant, pick an order
| and require it.

Me too.

|> * Why don't we use xs:boolean for boolean flags instead of "yes" and "no"
|>  (e.g. the sequence attribute on p:input)?
|
| Hear hear!

No. We don't use any XSD types anywhere else, why here? I don't plan
to have an XSD-aware XProc pipeline processor.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 14:46:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT