W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Review of Spec

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:51:40 +0000
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bfy86tv9f.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Norman Walsh writes:

> |> * Why don't we use xs:boolean for boolean flags instead of "yes" and "no"
> |>  (e.g. the sequence attribute on p:input)?
> |
> | Hear hear!
>
> No. We don't use any XSD types anywhere else, why here? I don't plan
> to have an XSD-aware XProc pipeline processor.

Understood -- the proposal is to allow true|false|0|1 instead of
yes|no

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF+V18kjnJixAXWBoRAmC/AJ4x4jgkG0k0FKE1aMKKL59Ydx+Y4wCeK+7l
hq7fTzYdHvfXlloNpN+fP8o=
=cBnr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 14:52:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT