W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Review of Spec

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:57:44 +0000
To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bodmuvnfr.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alex Milowski writes:

> * In 5, many of the content models have a preferred order for p:input,
> p:output,
>  p:parameter, etc.  Why wouldn't we just have a model that allows them in
>  any order:
>
>  (p:input|p:output|p:parameter|...)*

I like it the way it is.  If order isn't significant, pick an order
and require it.

> * Why don't we use xs:boolean for boolean flags instead of "yes" and "no"
>  (e.g. the sequence attribute on p:input)?

Hear hear!

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF+RiYkjnJixAXWBoRAgaVAJ4q3YlAwucuHkJRCIk1zqsl534n0wCdFSBn
r9e1X4XMIoFGKp5wVLTNWf0=
=tfv+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 09:57:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT