W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > March 2007

Re: in-scope namespaces & inline documents

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:00:18 +0000
To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bk5xivnbh.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Alex Milowski writes:

> I agree.   I think should say that namespace declarations fixup happens
> such that the in-scope namespaces and the document element's
> namespace attributes match for inline documents.

Happens where?  I _do not_ want processors which truly pipeline
infosets from one step to the next to have to do unnecessary fixup.

The spec. currently says almost nothing about serialisation, which is
fine with me.  If you want to add a serialisation section, and include
some remarks about fixup, we can talk about that, but I'm not sure
it's a good idea -- opens up more problems than it solves.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF+RkykjnJixAXWBoRAiC5AJwO+gH3rjQVhaM0dsOEAG9PIE60XACeIf20
x3d2XEfDNTUx3rCvdfDLikA=
=f+d2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 10:00:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT