- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:32:14 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:32:21 UTC
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| I think strongly that wrap sequence should take sequence as input and
| output sequence also...
I've got mixed feelings about this one. On the one hand, the whole
point of wrap-sequence is that it takes a sequence, puts a wrapper
around it, and produces a single document.
On the other hand, with group-adjacent, if we say that it can produce
a sequence, the results are pretty obvoius.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A great deal may be done by severity,
http://nwalsh.com/ | more by love, but most by clear
| discernment and impartial
| justice.--Goethe
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:32:21 UTC