- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:01:19 +0100
- To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
- Cc: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 1/31/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote: > > > On 1/31/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 1/31/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 1/31/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Some points : > > > > > > > > What about validation of Schema themselves ? > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure why this would be a problem. What do you mean? > > > > I have a schema S that I need to validate before using it for > > validating a group of document. > > Should i have to validate it against the Schema of Schema ? > > > The schema for schema will only do the XML part. Keep in mind that > if there is a problem with the schema, the validate component will just > fail because it couldn't load the schema. > Hum...so we need to different kind of error. One for schema error and One for document error Please see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Dec/0055.html > > -- > > --Alex Milowski > "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the > inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language > considered." > > Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 22:01:46 UTC