W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > January 2007

Re: Validate Component

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:01:19 +0100
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0701311401q24a81359wdd2f226c51446f56@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>
Cc: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>

On 1/31/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 1/31/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 1/31/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/31/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Some points :
> > > >
> > > > What about validation of Schema themselves ?
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm not sure why this would be a problem.  What do you mean?
> >
> > I have a schema S that I need to validate before using it for
> > validating a group of document.
> > Should i have to validate it against the Schema of Schema ?
>
>
> The schema for schema will only do the XML part.  Keep in mind that
> if there is a problem with the schema, the validate component will just
> fail because it couldn't load the schema.
>

Hum...so we need to different kind of error. One for schema error and
One for document error

Please see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2006Dec/0055.html




>
> --
>
> --Alex Milowski
> "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
> inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
> considered."
>
> Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 22:01:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:49 GMT