W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > January 2007

Re: Validate Component

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:05:32 -0800
Message-ID: <28d56ece0701311405v73c01681pf075ec279337c547@mail.gmail.com>
To: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 1/31/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 1/31/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/31/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 1/31/07, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/31/07, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Some points :
> > > > >
> > > > > What about validation of Schema themselves ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure why this would be a problem.  What do you mean?
> > >
> > > I have a schema S that I need to validate before using it for
> > > validating a group of document.
> > > Should i have to validate it against the Schema of Schema ?
> >
> >
> > The schema for schema will only do the XML part.  Keep in mind that
> > if there is a problem with the schema, the validate component will just
> > fail because it couldn't load the schema.
> >
>
> Hum...so we need to different kind of error. One for schema error and
> One for document error



I was hoping that our error context would handle this kind of
differentiation.



-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 22:05:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:49 GMT