W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: Validate Component

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:37:52 -0800
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87d54tyjlb.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| On 2/1/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
|> / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say:
|> | Name: [p:]validate
|> |
|> | Description:
|> |
|> | The validate component runs some form of schema validation assessment on
|> | a document.  It operates in one of two modes:  assertion or annotation.  In
|> | the
|>
|> Do we really want to go this route, or do we want to define three separate
|> components for XSD, Relax NG, Schematron validation?
|
| And what about DTD, NVDL or upcoming (DSDL Part 9) Datatype- and
| Namespace-aware DTDs ?

DTD processing is something that happens at parsing time, and a lot of
DTD processing doesn't even make sense if you start with an infoset,
so I'm happy not to support a validation component for that.
(Datatypes and namespaces not withstanding.)

NVDL will be its own component, I think.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
XML Standards Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Received on Thursday, 1 February 2007 15:38:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:49 GMT