- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:24:33 +0100
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 2/1/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: > | On 2/1/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote: > |> / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say: > |> | Name: [p:]validate > |> | > |> | Description: > |> | > |> | The validate component runs some form of schema validation assessment on > |> | a document. It operates in one of two modes: assertion or annotation. In > |> | the > |> > |> Do we really want to go this route, or do we want to define three separate > |> components for XSD, Relax NG, Schematron validation? > | > | And what about DTD, NVDL or upcoming (DSDL Part 9) Datatype- and > | Namespace-aware DTDs ? > > DTD processing is something that happens at parsing time ... So in you conception the DTD must be taken into account in p:load, is this correct ? Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:31:44 UTC