W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2007

Re: Validate Component

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:24:33 +0100
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0702010924g1ab2fa8n7448dd81601a9456@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org

On 2/1/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> / Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
> | On 2/1/07, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@sun.com> wrote:
> |> / Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> was heard to say:
> |> | Name: [p:]validate
> |> |
> |> | Description:
> |> |
> |> | The validate component runs some form of schema validation assessment on
> |> | a document.  It operates in one of two modes:  assertion or annotation.  In
> |> | the
> |>
> |> Do we really want to go this route, or do we want to define three separate
> |> components for XSD, Relax NG, Schematron validation?
> |
> | And what about DTD, NVDL or upcoming (DSDL Part 9) Datatype- and
> | Namespace-aware DTDs ?
>
> DTD processing is something that happens at parsing time ...

So in you conception the DTD must be taken into account in p:load, is
this correct ?

Mohamed

-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2007 17:31:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:49 GMT