Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Innovimax SARL writes:

> Henri,
>
> I find your proposal very appealing, but the fact of loosing recursive
> pipeline is too big a loss for me
>
> Can we lighten this behaviour ?

The rest of that message [1] fixes this . . .

ht

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2007Nov/0087.html
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHWqCMkjnJixAXWBoRAiQZAJ4/g4Mf6LpN7oti9PKGPy8YkS0eRACfcyR0
zLaA6X81NcI3wMIh2ATSe78=
=aIID
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----