- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 08:21:28 -0800
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On 12/8/07, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Innovimax SARL writes: > > > Henri, > > > > I find your proposal very appealing, but the fact of loosing recursive > > pipeline is too big a loss for me > > > > Can we lighten this behaviour ? > > The rest of that message [1] fixes this . . . You can also write a pipeline with a declare-step step in it that contains the recursive portion. The the simplest version is a pipeline document that invokes the 'main' step. That would avoid having to make pipeline libraries invokable just to make recursion work. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Saturday, 8 December 2007 16:21:36 UTC