- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:13:20 +0000
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 So the two things that you lose on my proposal are the ability to write a single recursive pipeline (because <p:pipeline> is untyped, on my proposal, so there's no way to call it), and the ability to import a single pipeline document. Following the programming language analogy which partly informed my proposal, here's a further step, which doesn't change the proposal in any detail, but solves those two problems: <p:pipeline> ... </p:pipeline> is just an abbreviation for <p:pipeline-library> <p:declare-step type="main"> <p:input port="!source" primary="yes"/> <!-- iff no primary input declared in the original--> <p:output port="!result" primary="yes"/> <!-- iff no primary output declared in the original--> ... </p:declare-step> </p:pipeline-library> And we say that running a pipeline library defaults to running the step whose type is 'main'. So now you can write a single recursive pipeline (it has a type you can use to call it with now, namely 'main'), and you can import single pipelines, because they are _really_ libraries after all. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHUCiQkjnJixAXWBoRAkUAAJ4vdIZltWvv2183DpRhQoExSHIDdwCcDnD4 +3OaGPaiZ1alEIp0KPOVz9A= =U+UO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 15:13:27 UTC