W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: Defaulting step and port on p:pipe

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:40:54 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <87d4y7dx7t.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| but I thing we should throw some errors when there could be ambiguousity:

Sorry, yes.

| For example what if the port is not a primary port ?
| <p:xinclude/>
| <p:xsl-formatter/>
| <p:identity>
|    <p:input port="source">
|       <p:pipe port="result"/> <!-- which one : xinclude or xsl:formatter -->
|   </p:input>
| </p:identity>

If the step name is not given, the step is the immediately preceding
step in document order. If there is no preceding step, it is the

If the port is not given, it is the primary output of the selected
step. It is an error if there is no primary output on the selected

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | People often say that this or that
http://nwalsh.com/            | person has not yet found himself. But
                              | the self is not something one finds, it
                              | is something one creates.--Thomas Szasz

Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 16:41:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:44 UTC