W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Validation in general

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:59:35 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <877irtx388.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Dear,
|
| We already have p:validate-xml-schema and p:validate-relax-ng
|
| It seems we still miss at least two of existing more or less
| widespread technology :

I wonder how many others we're missing?

| * p:validate-schematron

I'm fine with adding schematron.

| * p:nvdl
|
| For NVDL, the recombine part which is not stable at the moment, could
| be a interesting part of  the use of sequence and dynamic output ports
| and is AFAIK is the use-cases of XProc ([1])

It would be nice to have a concrete proposal for how the recombination
parts of NVDL would work.

| Another point is, that we have to deal with compound schemas
| (Relax+Schematron and XML Schema+Schematron) and with DTD

I stand by what I've said before, DTD validation is available only
through the p:load component. Nothing else makes any sense.

I'm not sure we have to deal with compound schemas. If you want both,
use both components. If you want both at once, use an
implementation-defined component that you know does both.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There has never been a perfect
http://nwalsh.com/            | government, because men have passions;
                              | and if they did not have passions,
                              | there would be no need for
                              | government.-- Voltaire

Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 15:59:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:50 GMT