- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:08:06 +0100
- To: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Cc: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[anon] writes:
> But now I wonder... Section 2.3 says:
>
> "If a step has a single output port and that port is explicitly marked
> "primary='false'", or if a step has more than one output port and none
> is explicitly marked as the primary, then the primary output port of
> that step is undefined."
>
> So is it right that the following:
>
> <p:declare-step>
> <p:input port="one"/>
> <p:input port="two" primary="true"/>
> </p:declare-step>
>
> results in both "one" and "two" being non-primary?
Presuming you meant those to be output ports, so we have
<p:declare-step>
<p:output port="one"/>
<p:output port="two" primary="true"/>
</p:declare-step>
"... a step has more than one output port and _none is explicitly marked_
as the primary," [emphasis added]
I don't see how the above words apply to this case -- *two* _is_
explicitly marked as primary. Or am I missing something?
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFKaDaJkjnJixAXWBoRAlsaAJ0V3KjEXT/UOHMGpvyPX2fcd+2bAwCfbjOf
uQZ+YCUe6YMN01hNnJ2cwNM=
=4BSL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 10:08:49 UTC