RE: Semantics of p:wrap

• From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
• Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:37:10 -0400
• To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <6E216CCE0679B5489A61125D0EFEC787103ED599@CORPUSMX10A.corp.emc.com>

Hi all,

I went over the steps that have the "match" option quickly, and all of
them are recursive, with the exception of p:delete, p:replace, and
p:string-replace, where recursion makes no sense.

Making p:wrap non-recursive would make the step behave differently than
the other steps. Also, because of symmetry (p:unwrap is recursive), I am
now also inclined to say that p:wrap should be recursive, too.

Regards,
Vojtech

Received on Tuesday, 21 July 2009 06:37:59 UTC