W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > July 2009

Re: Semantics of p:wrap

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:10:42 +0100
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bd47vwd19.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'mm inclined against the proposed change, on the grounds that if we
make the change, there is no way to get the recursive behaviour if
that's what you want, whereas if we clarify that recursion _does_
happen, you can still get non-recursion by using

  match="section[not(ancestor::section)]"

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFKZJcCkjnJixAXWBoRAq5GAJ48STFAiXLsqCFbFaTkk0eE79KFCQCfXn8j
VHlQFx3LkdAHYF/9+UMItbo=
=l0Of
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 20 July 2009 16:11:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 July 2009 16:11:28 GMT