W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Ordering of steps in a subpipeline

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:41:58 +0000
To: Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
Cc: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bfxjagxzt.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I think the spec. is pretty clear that defaulting depends on the order
of the elements in the pipeline document:

(from 2.5):

 "[In a step's environment, i]f there is a _preceding sibling step_
  element:

    * If that preceding sibling has a primary output port, then that
      output port becomes the default readable port." [emphasis added]

(from 5.1.1):

  "If no binding is provided for a primary input port, the input will
   be bound to the default readable port."

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJeZDpkjnJixAXWBoRAsEIAJ4phvEAJxrEUXF54HGHpMdTuGSQVQCcDMJF
hVK/7janc27rDBd7J3Tul/k=
=FugV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 09:42:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 23 January 2009 09:42:42 GMT