- From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:14:38 -0500
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
> I think your second example is still broken, because it contains a > loop. > > Here's your example: > > <p:group> > <p:output port="result"> > <p:inline><doc/><p:inline> > </p:output> > <p:identity name="identity1"> > <p:input port="source"> > <p:pipe step="identity2" port="result"/> > </p:input> > </p:input> > <p:identity name="identity2"/> > </p:group> > Hmm, then I misunderstood what 'ordering of steps based on connections between them' means. I thought that in this case, the processor would detect that "identity1" explicitly depends on "identity1", and it would therefore reverse the evaluation order of the steps. After that, it would create the default bindings for the unbound input ports, options, etc... But maybe I just see it more complicated than it is. Regards, Vojtech
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 17:16:15 UTC