Re: p:log on atomic steps?

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:

At present, p:log is only allowed on compound steps. Was this intentional?


Are you sure? I have been using it on atomic steps - the step grammar allows
it:

<p:atomic-step
  name? = NCName>
    (p:input |
     p:with-option |
     p:with-param |
     p:log)*
</p:atomic-step>

Cheers,
Josh Matthews