W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > October 2008

Re: p:log on atomic steps?

From: Josh Matthews <joshmatthews@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:58:05 -0400
Message-ID: <ffee23380810201958s3c931b9ay3ed57033641b47dc@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:

At present, p:log is only allowed on compound steps. Was this intentional?


Are you sure? I have been using it on atomic steps - the step grammar allows
it:

<p:atomic-step
  name? = NCName>
    (p:input |
     p:with-option |
     p:with-param |
     p:log)*
</p:atomic-step>

Cheers,
Josh Matthews
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2008 02:58:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:25 UTC