W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > October 2008

Re: p:log on atomic steps?

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:10:59 +0200
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2k5c25y8s.fsf@nwalsh.com>
"Josh Matthews" <joshmatthews@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
>
> At present, p:log is only allowed on compound steps. Was this intentional?
>
> Are you sure? I have been using it on atomic steps - the step grammar allows
> it:
>
> <p:atomic-step
>   name? = NCName>
>     (p:input |
>      p:with-option |
>      p:with-param |
>      p:log)*
> </p:atomic-step>

Ah. More evidence that it's a spec bug. If you look at the description
of the built-in steps, it's not listed anywhere.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Not only are there no happy endings,
http://nwalsh.com/            | there aren't even any endings.
                              | (American Gods)--Neil Gaiman

Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2008 05:12:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:25 UTC