- From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 19:30:16 +0200
- To: "Florent Georges" <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Cc: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> wrote: > > 2008/10/5 Norman Walsh wrote: > >> I think the shortest argument why is that the BNF for an XSLT 2.0 >> Pattern[2] (which we call an XSLTMatchPattern and still need to cite a >> little more carefully) cannot be empty. > > I would second that for the same reason. +1 > > But I have a little question about your example: > >> <p:rename match="//item" new-name="foo"/> > > Do we agree this is equivalent to the following? (note the descendent axis) : > > <p:rename match="item" new-name="foo"/> Sure : this is an XSLT Match Pattern ! > >> The matched node is a comment and rename cannot >> target comments. > > About this example (matching a comment node), would it be an error > if the match expression matched both comment and element nodes? No I would be an error ONLY because it is matching a comment If it was matching both an element and an PI then it would be ok Xmlizer
Received on Sunday, 5 October 2008 17:30:52 UTC