W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > November 2008

Re: XSLT 2 and xsl:result-document

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:22:44 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2oczxs0fv.fsf@nwalsh.com> 
"Florent Georges" <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> writes:
>   But instead of telling about extensions (besides, you don't tell
> about XProc extensions, but XSLT extensions...) you can maybe relax
> the MUST and tell it is implementation -defined or -dependent.

Yes, I think that would do it.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is important to realize that any
http://nwalsh.com/            | lock can be picked with a big enough
                              | hammer.
Received on Sunday, 30 November 2008 15:23:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 30 November 2008 15:23:26 GMT