Re: XSLT 2 and xsl:result-document

2008/11/28 Norman Walsh wrote:

  Hi,

> Well. I see your point, but in this case the exsl:document extension
> is both quasi-standard and widely deployed. And there's no compelling
> reason for the MUST that exists in the current spec, it was just the
> editor being overzealous, I think.

  But instead of telling about extensions (besides, you don't tell
about XProc extensions, but XSLT extensions...) you can maybe relax
the MUST and tell it is implementation -defined or -dependent.

  Regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/