W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > February 2008

Re: xproc static and dynamic error output as xml

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:22:34 +0100
Message-ID: <a0ad8ffe0802210522r15c7403euf0b6053a408f13bd@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Vasil Rangelov" <boen.robot@gmail.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

I have change my mind on this ...

mostly to do with implementation limitation;

e.g. an informal survey of popular computing language error mechanisms
shows that there is an incredible variability in error output format
... as well as limited control either as a constraint imposed by
language designers or differences as imagined by language
processor/compiler implementators.

oddly formated plaintext error output has always interfered in making
unit testing reports nicer ... also I would have thought that a
standard standard error output XML vocabulary would be a no brainer in
software development, anyone know of anything with any traction out

cheers, Jim Fuller
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:22:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:25 UTC