- From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:22:34 +0100
- To: "Vasil Rangelov" <boen.robot@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
I have change my mind on this ... mostly to do with implementation limitation; e.g. an informal survey of popular computing language error mechanisms shows that there is an incredible variability in error output format ... as well as limited control either as a constraint imposed by language designers or differences as imagined by language processor/compiler implementators. oddly formated plaintext error output has always interfered in making unit testing reports nicer ... also I would have thought that a standard standard error output XML vocabulary would be a no brainer in software development, anyone know of anything with any traction out there? cheers, Jim Fuller
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2008 13:22:45 UTC