- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:49:17 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:49:33 UTC
/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| I think we can all see value in specifying static and dynamic error
| output as well formed xml
|
| for example;
|
| <err:result>
| <err:XS0049>It is a static error if the psvi-required attribute is
| "true" and the processor does not support passing PSVI annotations
| between steps.</err:XS0049>
| </err:result>
|
| is this something to leave as an implementation detail or should we
| amend 6 Errors section a little bit ?
I don't think we should say anything about how errors are reported.
Note, however, that, c:error generated errors will be WF XML by virtue
of being an input to a step.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | It is important what a man still plans
http://nwalsh.com/ | at the end. It shows the measure of
| injustice in his death.--Elias Canetti
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2008 15:49:33 UTC