W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > June 2007

Re: shaping up Xproc unit test thoughts

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:51:49 +0200
Message-ID: <a0ad8ffe0706131151l6f6588afoa9ed1178ec76cea8@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

/ Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| What's your definition of equivalent James?
|
| Something like xml signature?

I agree with using fn:deep-equal, but it not being xpath 1.0 means its
a not available for use here.

going the other way, I did spend some time, a few years now,
investigating xml similarity algorithms with no luck.

I think for now we are dealing with simple equality and what
XPATH/XSLT 1.0 has to offer here.

cheers, Jim Fuller
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 18:52:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT