Re: shaping up Xproc unit test thoughts

/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| / Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| | What's your definition of equivalent James?
| |
| | Something like xml signature?
|
| I agree with using fn:deep-equal, but it not being xpath 1.0 means its
| a not available for use here.
|
| going the other way, I did spend some time, a few years now,
| investigating xml similarity algorithms with no luck.
|
| I think for now we are dealing with simple equality and what
| XPATH/XSLT 1.0 has to offer here.

My test harness uses an extension component, px:equal, which is little
more than a wrapper around a call to fn:deep-equal.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | As charms are nonsense, nonsense is a
http://nwalsh.com/            | charm.--Benjamin Franklin