W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > June 2007

Re: decomposing viewport

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:39:02 +0200
Message-ID: <a0ad8ffe0706131139s7eff98f3v2ff6262cd7086535@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

On 6/13/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> The XQuery Update Facility isn't a recommendation yet, and even if it
> was, I wouldn't even consider placing that much burden on
> implementors. I'm not surprised that p:viewport can be expressed as an
> XQuery Update task, but surely it's a small subset of that technology.

opps...I missed the @match attribute on first (and second) reading of
the spec for p:viewport...which had me a bit at a lost for the use of

in any event, this raises the question of  p:insert, p:delete, and
p:replace steps....

one suggestion, why not roll up the 3 steos into one step called p:update ?

> | p:view-port
> |

and what about p:read-port ? perhaps a bit too 'active' in meaning.

cheers, JIm Fuller
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 18:39:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:24 UTC