W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > June 2007

Re: clarify xpath relation to XProc

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:04:16 -0400
To: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <87k5u9aw2n.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| ok, which is of course reasonable thinking,
|
| I am interested in the 'incompatibility' points with current XProc if
| Xpath 2.0 was used. It might be a 'bridge to far' thinking about
| optional XPath 2.0 support in v1 Xproc....

It would be a significant impediment to interoperability. I don't
think we're going to go there.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.

Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 18:04:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT