W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > June 2007

Re: clarify xpath relation to XProc

From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:30:54 +0200
Message-ID: <a0ad8ffe0706110730k4f6f9fa0we1e0bdf33e174fed@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

ok, which is of course reasonable thinking,

I am interested in the 'incompatibility' points with current XProc if
Xpath 2.0 was used. It might be a 'bridge to far' thinking about
optional XPath 2.0 support in v1 Xproc....

cheers, Jim Fuller



On 6/11/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote:
> James Fuller wrote:
> > What is the position of the wg on the impact of XPATH 2 support, I am
> > assuming that XPATH 1 was a deliberate decision to go with.
>
> I think the general feeling was that requiring XPath 2.0 would be too
> great an implementation burden for v1 of XProc, mostly because there
> aren't many off-the-shelf XPath 2.0 implementations around at the moment.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeni
> --
> Jeni Tennison
> http://www.jenitennison.com
>
Received on Monday, 11 June 2007 14:30:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT