W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > June 2007

Re: clarify xpath relation to XProc

From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:35:21 +0100
Message-ID: <466D4F99.4010807@jenitennison.com>
To: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@gmail.com>
CC: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

James Fuller wrote:
> What is the position of the wg on the impact of XPATH 2 support, I am
> assuming that XPATH 1 was a deliberate decision to go with.

I think the general feeling was that requiring XPath 2.0 would be too 
great an implementation burden for v1 of XProc, mostly because there 
aren't many off-the-shelf XPath 2.0 implementations around at the moment.

Cheers,

Jeni
-- 
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Monday, 11 June 2007 13:35:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:42 GMT