W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > October 2011

[closed] Request for edit-in-place to XPointer Framework

From: Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:13:34 +0200
Message-ID: <4EA5101E.6000509@w3.org>
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
CC: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, webreq@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Hi Paul,

The document has been updated.

Regards,

Denis

On 20/10/11 23:47, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> Dear Webreq,
>
> Please see the below message for context and then the rest
> of this message for the actual request.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 2011 October 19 11:57
>> To: Grosso, Paul
>> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: XPointer Framework doesn't reference the XPointer
> Registry
>>
>> On 19 Oct 2011, at 11:46 AM, Grosso, Paul wrote:
>>
>>> Ian,
>>>
>>> It has been pointed out [1] that the XPointer Framework Rec [2]
>>> has no reference to the XPointer Registry [3].  This isn't
>>> really surprising given that the registry didn't exist when
>>> the Rec came out, but it has been said that people now expect
>>> the XPointer Framework spec to have such a reference.
>>>
>>> The XML Core WG is loath to reopen the XPointer Framework Rec
>>> (note that it was never our document, it was produced by the
>>> now closed XLink WG), and we are wondering if it would be possible
>>> to edit the spec in place to add a reference to the XPointer
> Registry
>>> from the SOTD of the Rec.
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Yes, we can do that. Please propose text on webreq@w3.org and we will
>> do something like this:
>>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Views-20001113/
>>
>> Please cc me as well. Thanks!
>>
>> Ian
>>
>>>
>>> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Sep/0009
>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/
>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/
>
> The XML Core WG requests the following edit-in-place (3 files) to
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/:
>
> --------------
>
> HTML: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/Overview.var
>
> In the SOTD, in between the</p>  and<p>  in the following:
>
> foundational part of a fragment identifier syntax for the XML Media
> types.</p><p>Public comments on this Recommendation are welcome.  Please
> send them to
>
> *** please insert (where the two occurrences of XX are replaced by the
> day's date):
>
> <div id="notice-201110XX" style="border: solid black 1px; padding:
> 0.5em; background: #FFB;">
> <p><strong>Document Status Update 2011-10-XX</strong>: This paragraph is
> informative. On 18 November 2005
> an<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/">XPointer
> Schemes Registry</a>  was approved for
> public use under the terms of
> an<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-policy.html">XPointer
> Scheme Name Registry Policy</a>.</p>
> </div>
>
> --------------
>
> XML:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/xptr-framework.xml
>
> In the SOTD, in between the</p>  and<p>  in the following:
>
> Media types.</p>
>
> 			<p>Public comments on this Recommendation are
> welcome.  Please send them to
>
> *** please insert (where the two occurrences of XX are replaced by the
> day's date):
>
> <p id="notice-201110XX" role="edited-in-place"><kw>Document Status
> Update 2011-10-XX</kw>: This paragraph is informative. On 18 November
> 2005
> an<loc href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/">XPointer
> Schemes Registry</loc>  was approved for
> public use under the terms of
> an<loc href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-policy.html">XPointer
> Scheme Name Registry Policy</loc>.</p>
>
> ------------------
>
> XSL first choice: http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-REC.css
>
> Since this is a W3C-wide concept, the best solution here is to add
> to http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-REC.css the following CSS:
>
> .edited-in-place {border: solid black 1px; padding: 0.5em; background:
> #FFB;}
>
> ---
>
> XSL alternative:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/xmlspec.xsl
>
> If we do not want to edit W3C-REC.css, then edit the local XSLT by
> adding:
>
> .edited-in-place {border: solid black 1px; padding: 0.5em; background:
> #FFB;}
>
> after
> div.exampleHeader { font-weight: bold;
>                      margin: 4px}
> near the bottom of the template name="css".
>
> -----------------
>
> Let me know if you have any questions or issues.
>
> thanks,
>
> Paul
> for the XML Core WG
>
>
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 07:13:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 24 October 2011 07:13:41 GMT