W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > October 2011

RE: [closed] Request for edit-in-place to XPointer Framework

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:16:46 -0400
Message-ID: <9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA03E1F83B@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: "Denis Ah-Kang" <denis@w3.org>
Cc: "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, <webreq@w3.org>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Thanks.

I note that the CSS wasn't updated so that the XML version
doesn't have the same style for this paragraph.  That isn't
important to me, but I just wondered if that was what was
decided to do.

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Denis Ah-Kang [mailto:denis@w3.org]
> Sent: Monday, 2011 October 24 2:14
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: Ian Jacobs; webreq@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: [closed] Request for edit-in-place to XPointer Framework
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> The document has been updated.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Denis
> 
> On 20/10/11 23:47, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> > Dear Webreq,
> >
> > Please see the below message for context and then the rest
> > of this message for the actual request.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, 2011 October 19 11:57
> >> To: Grosso, Paul
> >> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> >> Subject: Re: XPointer Framework doesn't reference the XPointer
> > Registry
> >>
> >> On 19 Oct 2011, at 11:46 AM, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ian,
> >>>
> >>> It has been pointed out [1] that the XPointer Framework Rec [2]
> >>> has no reference to the XPointer Registry [3].  This isn't
> >>> really surprising given that the registry didn't exist when
> >>> the Rec came out, but it has been said that people now expect
> >>> the XPointer Framework spec to have such a reference.
> >>>
> >>> The XML Core WG is loath to reopen the XPointer Framework Rec
> >>> (note that it was never our document, it was produced by the
> >>> now closed XLink WG), and we are wondering if it would be possible
> >>> to edit the spec in place to add a reference to the XPointer
> > Registry
> >>> from the SOTD of the Rec.
> >>
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >> Yes, we can do that. Please propose text on webreq@w3.org and we
> will
> >> do something like this:
> >>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Views-20001113/
> >>
> >> Please cc me as well. Thanks!
> >>
> >> Ian
> >>
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Sep/0009
> >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/
> >>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/
> >
> > The XML Core WG requests the following edit-in-place (3 files) to
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/:
> >
> > --------------
> >
> > HTML: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-
> 20030325/Overview.var
> >
> > In the SOTD, in between the</p>  and<p>  in the following:
> >
> > foundational part of a fragment identifier syntax for the XML Media
> > types.</p><p>Public comments on this Recommendation are welcome.
> Please
> > send them to
> >
> > *** please insert (where the two occurrences of XX are replaced by
> the
> > day's date):
> >
> > <div id="notice-201110XX" style="border: solid black 1px; padding:
> > 0.5em; background: #FFB;">
> > <p><strong>Document Status Update 2011-10-XX</strong>: This
paragraph
> is
> > informative. On 18 November 2005
> > an<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/">XPointer
> > Schemes Registry</a>  was approved for
> > public use under the terms of
> > an<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-policy.html">XPointer
> > Scheme Name Registry Policy</a>.</p>
> > </div>
> >
> > --------------
> >
> > XML:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/xptr-
> framework.xml
> >
> > In the SOTD, in between the</p>  and<p>  in the following:
> >
> > Media types.</p>
> >
> > 			<p>Public comments on this Recommendation are
> > welcome.  Please send them to
> >
> > *** please insert (where the two occurrences of XX are replaced by
> the
> > day's date):
> >
> > <p id="notice-201110XX" role="edited-in-place"><kw>Document Status
> > Update 2011-10-XX</kw>: This paragraph is informative. On 18
November
> > 2005
> > an<loc href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/">XPointer
> > Schemes Registry</loc>  was approved for
> > public use under the terms of
> > an<loc
href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-policy.html">XPointer
> > Scheme Name Registry Policy</loc>.</p>
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > XSL first choice: http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-REC.css
> >
> > Since this is a W3C-wide concept, the best solution here is to add
> > to http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-REC.css the following CSS:
> >
> > .edited-in-place {border: solid black 1px; padding: 0.5em;
> background:
> > #FFB;}
> >
> > ---
> >
> > XSL alternative:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/xmlspec.xsl
> >
> > If we do not want to edit W3C-REC.css, then edit the local XSLT by
> > adding:
> >
> > .edited-in-place {border: solid black 1px; padding: 0.5em;
> background:
> > #FFB;}
> >
> > after
> > div.exampleHeader { font-weight: bold;
> >                      margin: 4px}
> > near the bottom of the template name="css".
> >
> > -----------------
> >
> > Let me know if you have any questions or issues.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Paul
> > for the XML Core WG
> >
> >
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 14:17:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 24 October 2011 14:17:37 GMT