W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2010

XLink status

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:28:32 -0500
To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m24olq17db.fsf@nwalsh.com>
> 9.  XLink 1.1.

I published new drafts a couple of days ago. Or maybe yesterday. But I
did it ;-)

> Norm has prepared an updated DoC at 
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/
> ACTION to Norm:  Update the DoC accordingly.

Now updated. I think 5 is resolved, though I'm not sure.

It looks like Henry left 8 dangling.

> The latest editor's draft (24 January 2010) is at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview.html
> Henry finds the DTD/RelaxNG/XSD fragments throughout the spec unhelpful 
> and would like to remove them (leaving them only in the appendices).
> Henry specifically referenced the example immediately preceding 5.3.
> But this was in the CR, so we will probably leave it, but we will
> remove the default for xlink:type.

Where will we remove this?

> Norm created an updated IR at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ir.html
> ACTION to Norm:  Adding a mention of the test suite at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/03/xlink11-tests to the IR.


> A diff between 1.0 and the latest PR ready draft is at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview-diff.html
> ACTION to Norm:  Update the DoC and IR.


> ACTION to Norm:  Make the latest draft a PR.


> ACTION to Norm:  Also produce a diff between the Xlink 1.1 CR 
> and this latest draft.

Done. Well, I did it between the last published draft and this draft.
I could go back to the previous CR as well, if you want.

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Vision is the art of seeing things
http://nwalsh.com/            | invisible.-- Swift

Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 20:29:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:41 UTC