- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:28:32 -0500
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m24olq17db.fsf@nwalsh.com>
> 9. XLink 1.1.
I published new drafts a couple of days ago. Or maybe yesterday. But I
did it ;-)
> Norm has prepared an updated DoC at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/
[...]
> ACTION to Norm: Update the DoC accordingly.
Now updated. I think 5 is resolved, though I'm not sure.
It looks like Henry left 8 dangling.
> The latest editor's draft (24 January 2010) is at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview.html
>
> Henry finds the DTD/RelaxNG/XSD fragments throughout the spec unhelpful
> and would like to remove them (leaving them only in the appendices).
> Henry specifically referenced the example immediately preceding 5.3.
> But this was in the CR, so we will probably leave it, but we will
> remove the default for xlink:type.
Where will we remove this?
> Norm created an updated IR at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ir.html
>
> ACTION to Norm: Adding a mention of the test suite at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/03/xlink11-tests to the IR.
Done.
> A diff between 1.0 and the latest PR ready draft is at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview-diff.html
>
> ACTION to Norm: Update the DoC and IR.
Done.
> ACTION to Norm: Make the latest draft a PR.
Done.
> ACTION to Norm: Also produce a diff between the Xlink 1.1 CR
> and this latest draft.
Done. Well, I did it between the last published draft and this draft.
I could go back to the previous CR as well, if you want.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Vision is the art of seeing things
http://nwalsh.com/ | invisible.-- Swift
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 20:29:08 UTC